**
The home fronts proved crucial in World War I. British Foreign Secretarry Sir Edward Grey (1862-1933) who worked tirelessly to preserve the peace when it became clear that Europe was spiraling toward war remarked, "The lights are going out all over Europe and they will not be lit again in our generation." He was essentially correct, but this was not how most saw it. Military commanders thought it would be a short swift conlict of rapid movement. It almost was, but when the French stopped the Germans on the Marne (September 1914), the war bogged down into a long grueling war of attrition. The well-prepared Germans with the strongest army in Europe head the advantage in a short war. The Allies with greater resources and the Royal Navy capable of blockading German held the advantage in a war attrition. This long drawn out war also made the home front critical. It would be the countries with the greatest resources and the which used those resources most efficiently that would prevail. While the Allies had the greater resources and with the Royal Navy the ability to import what they lacked. Even so the two-sides were relatively evenly matched. Rational calculations dictated that Germany do every thing possible to keep America out of the War. German policy, however, persued policies that eventually brought America and its huge resources into the War. Countries varied as to how efficently countries used their resources. Russia was the most defficent country in utilizing its resources which led to the Russian Revolution (October 1917) and Russia's withdrawl from the War. Surprisingly the Germans while mobilizing its industrial strength efficently, failed to do the same with its agriculture. Partly as a result, it was the German home front which eventually cracked.
The home fronts proved crucial in World War I. British Foreign Secretarry Sir Edward Grey (1862-1933) who worked tirelessly to preserve the peace when it became clear that Europe was spiraling toward war remarked, "The lights are going out all over Europe and they will not be lit again in our generation." He was essentially correct, but this was not how most saw it. Military commanders thought it would be a short swift conlict of rapid movement. It almost was, but when the French stopped the Germans on the Marne (September 1914), the war bogged down into a long grueling war of attrition.
The well-prepared Germans with the strongest army in Europe head the advantage in a short war. The advantage shifted to the Allies which had greater resources and the Royal Navy capable of blockading German held the advantage in a war attrition. This long drawn out war also made the home front critical. It would be the countries with the greatest resources and the which used those resources most efficiently that would prevail. While the Allies had the greater resources and with the Royal Navy the ability to import what they lacked.
World War I was primarily a ground war. The naval war was, however, critical to the outcome. As a British naval commander corrected accessed, it was at sea that the Allies could lose the War in a single day. It was the Royal Navy blockade of Germant that proved critical in the War. Not only did it cause great provations in Germany, but it induced the German to launch unconditional submarine warfare (1917) bringing America into the War.
Even so the two-sides were relatively evenly matched. Rational calculations dictated that Germany do every thing possible to keep America out of the War. German policy, however, persued policies that eventually brought America and its huge resources into the War.
Individual Country Home Fronts
Countries varied as to the resources available and how efficently countries used their resources. Britain was a major uindustrial power. Unlike the other major combatants, Britain did not have a large standing army or a military draft. Thus it would be some time before its weight could be felt on the battlefield in a major way. Britain had a major weakness in that it was dependant on international trade. This was true both for foodstuffs, but raw material for industry as well. Britain;s critical sea lanes would be attacked by the Germans, especially by the U-boats. France for much of the War provided the bulk of the force blocking the Germans in the West. For France there was less difference between the front lines and the home front. France had the agricultural sector needed to feed the country. The home front remained solid during the War, but the huge casualties almost cracked the French Army. Russia was the most defficent country in utilizing its resources which led to the Russian Revolution (October 1917) and Russia's withdrawl from the War. Surprisingly Germany while mobilizing its industrial strength efficently, failed to do the same with its agriculture. Partly as a result, it was the German home front which eventually cracked. America was the world's most important industrial and agricultural nation. Wjle America was at first neutral, the home front played a critical role in he War. American public opinion was strongly for staying out of the War. German policies from the beginning, especially the invasion of neutral Belgium, turned American public opinion against Germany. Other German war policies, especially unrestricted submarine warfare, meant that went President Wilson asked Congress for a declaration of war. Pacifistic opinion rapidly gave way to a patriotic euforia and enthusiastic public support for the war effort. In all the blgernt countrues, the war brought about swweping social change.
Children's play was affected by the war. War games or variants like 'cops and robbers' or 'cowboys and Indians' are perenial favorites for boys. With the outbreak of the war, war games became an obsession for many boys. This was fueled with the acquisition of uniforms and war memorabilia from fathers and brothers at the front. Mothers must have had mixed feelings seeing their boys playing war, especially as so many had lost husbands and sons or other relatives in the fighting. Here we have few actual accounts, but have noted some interesting images.
We begin to see uniformed youth groups in the late-19th century. The Boys' Brigade in Britain and Wandevogel in Germany were the first. The bigstep, however, was the the foundation of the Boy Scouts by Baden Powell (1906) and soon after the Girl Scouts (1910). And both groups especially the Boy Scouts quickly spread to countries around the world, especially Europe and North America. The American Boy Scouts were founded (1910) and quickly became the largest youth group in the world. As a reslt when World War I erupted in Europe (1914) there were youth groups active in all of the belligerant powers. As the War contrary to expectations was not ended quickly in a few decisive battles, it became a long war of attrition and the the civilan populations in each country was mobilized in varios ways to support the caticysmic struggle. And because of the various youth groups, there was a role for boys and girls. It is not unique that boys wre involved in warfare. Boys until World War I had military conbat roles. This was not the case in World War I. There were no pre-teen drummer boys. But because of the youth groups here was an expanded non-military role for children.
The extent and duration of World War forced combatent nations to divert an increasing part of the economy to the war effort. At the same time raw material and manpower shortages affected production. This was especially the case of the Central Powers because of the Allied naval blockade. We believe that all the major combatents introduced rationing system, however, we have few details at this time.
World War I caused mass slaughter on a basis never before exoerienced in Europe. The number of father killed in every country is difficult to fathom. The loss of life in all the major combatent countries was astromical, although smaller in America which entered the War in 1917 and did not commit troops in large numbers until 1918. The number
of orphans was extremely high in Belgium and other areas where fighging took palace. ted. A friend tells me that early Life Magazine articles had some images of European children showing period clothes. I think in 1917-18 they ran a series of articles on French children who had lost their fathers in the War. The magazine I think was asking for donations to help these families. The series contained lots of pictures of these, sadly mostly young, fatherless children. If anyone has access to a good University library, these Life Magazine images should be available. There apparently was a variety of boys clothes pictured. Another problem was that while many children were not orphaned, rhere were millions without fathers. As the father in the 1910s was the principal, if not thde only, income eraner, this maent that millions of children were reduced to poverty or very close to it.
Navigate the CIH Wprld War I Section:
[Return to Main World War I page]
[Return to Main war essay page]
[Aftermath]
[Alliances]
[Animals]
[Armistace]
[Biographies]
[Causes]
[Campaigns]
[Casualties]
[Children]
[Countries]
[Declaration of war]
[Deciding factors]
-------[Diplomacy]
[Economics]
-------[Geo-political crisis]
[]
[Intelligence]
[Military forces]
[Neutrality]
[Pacifism]
[People]
[Peace treaties]
[Propaganda]
[POWs]
[Russian Revolution]
[Signals and intelligence]
[Terrorism]
[Trench warfare]
------[Technology]
------[Weaponry]
[Bibliographies]
[Contributions]
[FAQs]
[Images]
[Links]
[Registration]
[Tools]
[Return to Main World War I page]
[Return to Main war essay page]
[Return to CIH Home page]