Irish Dancing: Set and Celi Controversy


Figure 1.--A perennial controversy between set dancers and ceili dancers concerning which form of dancing is "more traditional" or "more Irish". This basic issue leads to some of the most controversial subjects in the set dancing world. We notice pairs dancing at many Feiseanna.. We are not sure is this is classified set or ceili dancing..

A perennial controversy between set dancers and ceili dancers concerning which form of dancing is "more traditional" or "more Irish". This basic issue leads to some of the most controversial subjects in the set dancing world. Utltimately there may prove to be an acceptable compromise between "tradition" and "change". Indeed, many believe that dance enthusiastsd should accept the responsibility of learning how the sets were originally danced through workshops and classes. Many also believe, however, think that the heavy burden of tradition should not necessarily restrict the many dancing styles seen today at ceilis.

Difference

Irish dance experts note many differences between step dancing, set dancing, and ceili dancing. One Irish dancer writes, "Just a note, as a set dancer and step dancer, I would have to say set dancing is more natural as far as style goes. Ceili dancing is more formal in how the movements are executed, though both styles of dancing are choregraphed with specific movements. There are similiarities that cross over in both styles, but set dancing is more informal. Both are fun though!"

Battering

There is considersable controversy concerning battering. One dancer can't bring himself to believe that people who batter in the Lancers should be branded as dancing "incorrectly". Many simply conform to the style his partner is dancing, and they enjoy dancing both the smooth, gliding steps as well as the battering.

Regional Styles

Sadly many believe that in Ireland (particularly) the regional styles and the details of the dances are getting forgotten as enthusiasts try and learn more and more dances. Most dancers recognize that these changes are occurring in set dancing, but few agree on what to make of them. Many people would agree that details are being forgotten. But others would argue that as set dancers they are part of a living tradition. Rather than simply preserving the past, set dancing is continuing to evolve and the changes occurring should be at least tolerated as a natural part of the dances becoming more popular. The changes should not necessarily be lamented as tragedies. Set dancing's popularity is remarkable, and the number of people learning the dances seems to be steadily increasing. In some manner, dance enthusiasts should be thankful that so many people are dancing and that the dances were not lost.

Preservation

Inevitably, the current situation presents a conundrum. Should the past really be preserved in which very few people were dancing but they did so "correctly" over the present situation in which many many people are enjoying the dances and ensuring the survival of the sets? Dublin teachers appear exemplify the compromises that need to take place in our community and have made some excellent decisions lately in their efforts to promote the dancing of more obscure sets at ceilis.

Change and Tradition

Some believe that things are changing and rapidy. A typical dance is the Clare Lancers--collected and revived in the 1980s as a silent and smooth dance. However it is now battered to death because everyone wants to demonstrate how good they are by competing with each other to see who can make the most noise over the music. Others disagree. One enthusist insures HBC that people batter, not out of a sense of competition or to drown out the music or annoy other dancers. People batter because it is fun. I don't think I've ever seen anyone batter out of spite toward the dance or other dancers.

Others are convinced that the set dancers of today seem to have little respect for the tradition despite the excellent teachers that are around over here. And here is the heart of the debate: do we "respect tradition" and essentially become folk dancing museum pieces, or do we accept that we are dancers just as those who came before us? Do we dance just to preserve the past, or do we dance because we simply have a great passion for the music and the dance itself?

Compromise

There are Irish dancers who think it is possible to do both, but some compromises will have to be made. There is a great debate in America over the use of callers at ceilis. Callers, of course, are not traditional to set dancing, but the truth is that they enable a greater number of people to dance. At present, the majority of ceilis in Ireland except for those on the west coast utilize callers because they are such a great convenience. There are some disadvantages to calling, but I think the benefits outweigh them. (Many people would disagree with me.) I support Pat Murphy's remark that he defends calling simply because it allows more people to dance.

These changes have actually driven the older folk away from the scene, and the average age of set dancers would be 30'ish and getting younger. About 20 years ago it would have been 50'ish. Some begrudge the insinuation that younger dancers have no respect for our elders and that we are ruining the dances. Older dancers have been crucial to my set dancing experiences, and many are infinitely thankful for them. One dancer admits that at 22 years old, he is accustomed to being one of the youngest dancers at ceilis in both Ireland and America. He respects the tradition of set dancing with its local variations and details, and I endeavor to learn all of the "proper" steps. At the same time, he believes that young dancers are a living part of that tradition, and that past need not dictate every step danced at a ceili.






HBC






Navigate the Historic Boys' Clothing Web Site:
[Introduction] [Activities] [Biographies] [Chronology] [Cloth and textiles] [Clothing styles] [Countries] [Girls] [Topics]
[Bibliographies] [Contributions] [FAQs] [Glossaries] [Satellite sites] [Tools]
[Boys' Clothing Home]



Navigate the Historic Boys' Clothing Web chronological pages:
[The 1880s] [The 1890s] [The 1900s] [The 1910s] [The 1920s] [The 1930s]
[The 1940s] [The 1950s]



Navigate the Historic Boys' Clothing Web dance pages:
[Return to the Main Irish dance page]
[Return to the Main types of Irish dance page]
[Ballet] [Highland] [Ballroom]
[Native American] [Tap]



Navigate the Boys' Historical Clothing kilt pages:
[Main kilt page]
[Kilt suits] [Scottish kilts]
[Scottish boys clothing] [Scottish school uniform]
[Highland dance] [Irish kilts]
[Irish boys clothing]
[Main Irish step dancing page] [Greek kilts]



Created: December 16, 1999
Updated: 5:00 AM 12/15/2005