American Boy Dresses: Lengths


Figure 1.--These three brothers are unidentified, but look to be abour 2-8 years old. The older boy is apparently John W. The boys wearing dresses look to be about 2-5 years old. Both have very long hem lines. We are not sure why the dresses are so long. The boys were photographed at the Combe studio in Bath, New York. The cabinent card is undated, but looks like the late-1880s to us.

We see American boys wearing dresses with varying hem lengths. As far as we know, hem lengths for boys and girls were similar, although we have yet to definitely confirm this. We need to investigate girls' dresses to make sure of this. We note hem lengths which varied from just at or more commonly just below the knee to long ankle lengths. We do not see higher lengths because they were not worn at the time boys wore dresses. Knee-length dresses were worn by some little girls in Europe, but not in America. Fashion may be a factor here, but we are not sure how important this was. This varied somewhat over time, but we suspect that they often reflected the proclivities of the mother who may have had other thoughs that fashion in mind. The really long hems look rather unusual. Long hems were worn for women both for modesty and fashion. Both of these factors would seem less importnt for little boys. A mother might dress a younger boys in a dress with a long hem line thinking that the boy could wear the dess as he got older. And of course there are always hand-me-downs which might reflect older fashions and may likely come from an older boy or girl. This is difficult to assess, but we can gather information on the various lenhths and chronology. We find the same pattern in the other skirted garments boys wore.

Actual Lengths

We see American boys wearing dresses with varying hem lengths. We note hem lengths which varied from just at or more commonly just below the knee to long ankle lengths covering the child from the neck to the ankle. We do not see higher lengtgs because they were not worn at the time boys wore dresses. Knee-length dresses were worn by some little girls in Europe, but not in America. Many dresses were dome a mid lengths, about calf level. The really long hems look rather unusual on young children. Long hems were worn for women both for modesty and fashion. Both of these factors would seem less important for ery yong children especially little boys. This is difficult to assess, but we can gather information on the various lenhths and chronology. As this process develops we can begin t assess the prevalence of the various lenghs and the conventions involved. We find the same pattern in the other skirted garments boys wore such a skirts and kilts.

Longer Use

A mother might dress a younger boys in a dress with a long hem line thinking that the boy could wear the dress as he got older. This does not, however, explain the relly long, ankle-length dresses. And of course there are always hand-me-downs which might reflect older fashions and may likely come from an older boy or girl.

Fashion

Fashion may be a factor here, but we are not sure how important this was. This varied somewhat over time, but we suspect that they often reflected the proclivities of the mother who may have had other thoughs that fashion in mind.

Age

As far as we can tell, age does not seem to have been a fctor in the length of the dresses boys wore. They seem to have been essentialy the same lengths that girls at the times wore. This we still need to confirm. There is one exception to the basic rule that thre were no spcial length for boys ar various ages. We see a lot of boys wearing very ong dresses, even covering their ankles. The examples we have found to date were modtlyh the younger boys wearing dresses. We do not jnow why such very yojng boys had the longest dresses. The only thing we have been able to think of is that mothers were buying the dresses in lrge sizes thinking that the boys could grow into them and thus the dresses could be wirn longer hn ifthey had biufgt the right size.

Gender

As far as we know, hem lengths for boys and girls were similar, although we have yet to definitely confirm this. We need to investigate girls' dresses to make sure of this. Hopefully HBC readers will have infomation to add here.







HBC






Navigate the Historic Boys' Clothing Web dress pages:
[Return to the Main U.S. national dress page]
[Pinafores] [Ringlet curls] [Smocks] [Bodice kilts] [Kilts]
[Fauntleroy dresses] [Sailor dresses] [Fancy dresses]
[Dresses: 16th-18th centuries] [Dresses: Early-Mid-19th century]
[Dresses: Late-19th century] [Dresses: Early 20th century]
[Difficult images] [Movie dresses]



Navigate the Boys' Historical Clothing Web Site:
[Introduction] [Activities] [Biographies] [Chronology] [Clothing styles] [Countries]
[Bibliographies] [Contributions] [Essays] [FAQs] [Glossaries] [Images] [Links] [Registration] [Tools]
[Boys' Clothing Home]



Created: 12:25 AM 8/5/2008
Last updated: 7:28 AM 11/30/2014