|
A problem here is that many of the children are unidentified and it is difficult to identify the gender if the younger children because many boys were not yet breeched. The best indicator is a center hair part. This was a girls' style. We do not know for a fact that younger boys did not have center parts, but we have found very few examples. The centerpart is the best gender indicator we know of, except for the relatively short period around the turn-of-the 20th century when center parts were popular for boys. And we see bery few breeched boys with ringlets in the 60s. The relative rarity of breeched boys with ringlets leads us to believe ringlets were much more popular for girls than for boys throughout the 60s. We do see boys with ringlets, but we see many more children we believe are girls with their hair done in ringlets. Just using prevalence in the photographic record can not be used as absolute proof, but we believe it to be the best single measure of prevalence at the time. Here we would welcome reader insights.
Navigate Related HBC Pages:
[Return to the Main American 1860s ringlet curl gender page]
[Return to the Main American 1860s ringlet curl page]
[Return to the Main U.S. ringlet curl 19th century chronology page]
[Return to the Main U.S. ringlet curl chronology page]
[Teturn to the Main ringlet curl page]
[Return to the Main curl page]
[Bangs]
[Long hair]
[Hair bows]
[Caps]
[Collar bows]
Navigate the Boys' Historical Clothing Web Site:
[Return to the Main American late-19th century page]
[Introduction]
[Activities]
[Biographies]
[Chronology]
[Clothing styles]
[Countries]
[Bibliographies]
[Contributions]
[FAQs]
[Glossaries]
[Images]
[Links]
[Registration]
[Tools]
[Boys' Clothing Home]